1900 – 2000 Trends in metapsychology

Untitled project Layer 2 (1)
Here is a comparison and contrast of the key assumptions of the first and fourth waves of metapsychology as presented in the sources:
First Wave (Cognitive-Behaviorism)

Focus on Observable Phenomena: This wave insists on considering only externally observable, material phenomena as the basis for scientific inquiry.1

Rejection of Introspection: Introspection, consciousness, and thinking are dismissed as legitimate research areas.1

Reductionism: Cognitive psychology, inspired by digital computers, seeks to explain consciousness in terms of simpler, non-conscious subsystems, reducing it to information processes within a physical system.1

Materialistic View: This wave aligns with the dominant materialistic worldview of Western thought, viewing individuals as a combination of a robot and animal instincts.2

Scientism: Adherence to a “scientism” perspective that can resemble fundamentalist, dogmatic religious viewpoints, resistant to new data and ideas.2
Fourth Wave (Transpersonal Psychology)

Beyond the Persona: “Trans” implies going beyond the social mask or personality.3

Mystical Experiences: This wave acknowledges the historical presence of “mystical experiences” and feelings of being part of something larger.3

Beyond Materialism: Challenges the prevailing materialistic and scientistic worldview by suggesting there’s more to human experience than material processes and biological drives.45

Openness to Non-Ordinary States: Transpersonal psychology embraces the study of transpersonal experiences, which cannot be explained away by psychoanalytic defense mechanisms or biological explanations.5

Rejection of Dogma: Rather than adhering to a fixed belief system, transpersonal psychology encourages a scientific approach that is open to exploring these phenomena without resorting to faith-based explanations.5
Comparing and Contrasting

Focus: The first wave concentrates on observable behavior and cognitive processes, while the fourth wave expands the field of inquiry to include transpersonal and mystical experiences.

Methodology: The first wave prioritizes empirical observation and experimentation, while the fourth wave, while still valuing scientific rigor, is open to exploring subjective experiences and altered states of consciousness.

Worldview: The first wave aligns with a materialistic and reductionist view of reality, while the fourth wave challenges this perspective, suggesting a broader, more interconnected understanding of human consciousness.
Key Figures:

First Wave: Pavlov, Watson, Skinner, Beck, Wiener, Gardner, Lakoff, Kelly, Piaget.1

Fourth Wave: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Assagioli, Spinelli, Habermas, Murphy, Goleman, Grof, Lilly, Tart.67
It is important to note that these are broad generalizations and there is a spectrum of thought within each wave. Some contemporary researchers are working to integrate insights from both behaviorism/cognitive psychology and transpersonal psychology.

Here is a comparison and contrast of the key assumptions of the first and fourth waves of metapsychology as presented in the sources:
First Wave (Cognitive-Behaviorism)

Focus on Observable Phenomena: This wave insists on considering only externally observable, material phenomena as the basis for scientific inquiry.1

Rejection of Introspection: Introspection, consciousness, and thinking are dismissed as legitimate research areas.1

Reductionism: Cognitive psychology, inspired by digital computers, seeks to explain consciousness in terms of simpler, non-conscious subsystems, reducing it to information processes within a physical system.1

Materialistic View: This wave aligns with the dominant materialistic worldview of Western thought, viewing individuals as a combination of a robot and animal instincts.2

Scientism: Adherence to a “scientism” perspective that can resemble fundamentalist, dogmatic religious viewpoints, resistant to new data and ideas.2
Fourth Wave (Transpersonal Psychology)

Beyond the Persona: “Trans” implies going beyond the social mask or personality.3

Mystical Experiences: This wave acknowledges the historical presence of “mystical experiences” and feelings of being part of something larger.3

Beyond Materialism: Challenges the prevailing materialistic and scientistic worldview by suggesting there’s more to human experience than material processes and biological drives.45

Openness to Non-Ordinary States: Transpersonal psychology embraces the study of transpersonal experiences, which cannot be explained away by psychoanalytic defense mechanisms or biological explanations.5

Rejection of Dogma: Rather than adhering to a fixed belief system, transpersonal psychology encourages a scientific approach that is open to exploring these phenomena without resorting to faith-based explanations.5
Comparing and Contrasting

Focus: The first wave concentrates on observable behavior and cognitive processes, while the fourth wave expands the field of inquiry to include transpersonal and mystical experiences.

Methodology: The first wave prioritizes empirical observation and experimentation, while the fourth wave, while still valuing scientific rigor, is open to exploring subjective experiences and altered states of consciousness.

Worldview: The first wave aligns with a materialistic and reductionist view of reality, while the fourth wave challenges this perspective, suggesting a broader, more interconnected understanding of human consciousness.
Key Figures:

First Wave: Pavlov, Watson, Skinner, Beck, Wiener, Gardner, Lakoff, Kelly, Piaget.1

Fourth Wave: Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Assagioli, Spinelli, Habermas, Murphy, Goleman, Grof, Lilly, Tart.67
It is important to note that these are broad generalizations and there is a spectrum of thought within each wave. Some contemporary researchers are working to integrate insights from both behaviorism/cognitive psychology and transpersonal psychology.

What is the central claim of transpersonal psychology, and what distinguishes it from the other waves of metapsychology?

The Essence of Transpersonal Psychology
The central claim of transpersonal psychology is that human consciousness extends beyond the individual ego and personality, encompassing experiences that transcend the usual boundaries of self and connect individuals to a larger, interconnected reality. This assertion is rooted in the historical prevalence of “mystical experiences” and feelings of unity with something greater, which transpersonal psychology seeks to understand and integrate into a comprehensive view of human experience1.
Distinguishing Features of Transpersonal Psychology:
Several key characteristics set transpersonal psychology apart from the other waves of metapsychology:

Scope of Inquiry: Unlike the first and second waves, which focus primarily on observable behavior and the workings of the individual psyche, transpersonal psychology expands its scope to encompass “transpersonal experiences,” which are often characterized by altered states of consciousness, a sense of interconnectedness, and a profound shift in one’s perception of self and reality12. This broadening of the field of inquiry distinguishes transpersonal psychology from the more limited foci of behaviorism, cognitive psychology, and psychoanalysis.

Challenge to Materialism: Transpersonal psychology challenges the prevailing materialistic worldview that dominates the first three waves of metapsychology. Instead of reducing human experience to purely material processes and biological drives, transpersonal psychology acknowledges the reality and significance of subjective experiences that point toward a deeper, more spiritual dimension of human existence13. This challenge to the materialistic paradigm sets it apart from the reductionist tendencies of the earlier waves.

Emphasis on Meaning and Purpose: While the third wave (humanistic psychology) also explores themes of meaning and purpose, transpersonal psychology goes further by suggesting that meaning and purpose are not merely human constructs but may be inherent qualities of a larger, interconnected reality that humans can tap into through transpersonal experiences14. This perspective distinguishes transpersonal psychology from the humanistic focus on self-actualization within a primarily individualistic framework.

Methodological Openness: While still grounded in scientific principles, transpersonal psychology embraces a more open and inclusive methodology than the first and second waves. It recognizes the limitations of purely objective observation and experimentation when studying subjective experiences. This openness allows for the integration of diverse methods, including introspection, phenomenological inquiry, and the study of altered states of consciousness, which are often excluded from the more rigid methodologies of earlier waves2.
Transpersonal psychology, therefore, distinguishes itself from the other waves of metapsychology through its expansive scope, its challenge to materialistic reductionism, its emphasis on transcendent meaning and purpose, and its methodological openness to exploring the full spectrum of human consciousness.